Ielts Writing Logic banner
gloriage217 gloriage217

Ielts Writing Logic

Productivity community

Description

A cross-platform Agent Skill for IELTS Writing Task 1/2 guidance, essay review, and Socratic practice. Supports Codex, Qwen Code, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Cursor.

Installation

This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no exact command to give. Open the source below and copy the folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.

README

IELTS Writing Underlying Logic

[中文](#中文说明) · [English](#english)

An open-source, cross-platform Agent Skill for **Codex**, **Qwen Code**, **Claude Code**, **Gemini CLI**, and **Cursor**. It supports IELTS Writing Task 1 charts and Task 2 essays, helping learners analyse a prompt, build a defensible position, write annotated model essays, and diagnose drafts against Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy.

What it does

  • Generates Task 2 model essays with question-type analysis, a stance path, SEESC paragraph annotations, and a correspondence check.
  • Reviews learner essays using the TR / CC / LR / GR criteria and rewrites only the weakest paragraph.
  • Runs a three-round Socratic practice mode for learners who want guided practice rather than an immediate answer.
  • Supports Task 1 chart questions with an Overall + grouping + comparison approach.

The underlying-logic method

This is not a bank of interchangeable phrases. It is a **type-first writing system**: identify what the question asks, choose that question type's logic, then build each paragraph as proof. The same A/B decision must not be forced onto every Task 2 prompt.

Task 2 prompt
    |
    +-- Agree / disagree → evaluate the claim and state a clear degree of agreement
    +-- Discuss both views → analyse the A/B relationship before choosing a position
    +-- Positive / negative development → weigh benefits against drawbacks
    +-- Causes / problems + solutions → diagnose causes, then match each cause to a remedy

Four Task 2 routes

Question type First decision Writing logic
Agree / disagree How far does the claim hold? Take a clear, defensible degree of agreement; build non-overlapping reasons, with a limited concession where useful.
Discuss both views What is the relationship between A and B? Use the A/B decision route below; represent both views and state your own posi