Zedong-Liu

SparseReading — AI skill for Claude Code

AI community

SparseRead: token-efficient reading for AI agents.

How to install SparseReading

This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no exact command to give. Open Zedong-Liu/SparseReading and copy the folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.

What SparseReading does

SparseRead: token-efficient reading for AI agents. 读得更少,token 更省,证据不变。 Paper arXiv:2608.22237

Alternatives in AI

  • Cursor Talk To Figma MCP — TalkToFigma: MCP integration between AI Agent (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex) and Figma, allowing Agentic AI to c 7k ★
  • ARIS Agent Guide — For AI agents reading this repo 6.2k ★
  • Clawcodex — Token efficient Claude Code full Python rebuild 875 ★

README

SparseRead

**Read less. Solve more.**

SparseRead is a training-free reading layer for tool-using agents. It controls which evidence enters the model context before an agent pays the cost of a broad read—while keeping provenance, refinement, verification, and native fallbacks explicit.

[![CI](https://github.com/Zedong-Liu/SparseReading/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/Zedong-Liu/SparseReading/actions/workflows/ci.yml) [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-yellow.svg)](LICENSE) [Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22237) · [Site](https://zedong-liu.github.io/SparseReading/) · [中文](README.zh-CN.md)

SparseRead replay: full read vs sparse evidence, then the cost-quality frontier

Agents are good at reasoning, but their default reading action is often still:

read everything -> put everything in context -> start reasoning

That is expensive for long reports, PDFs, workspaces, logs, spreadsheets, and multi-file audits. SparseRead adds a small control plane in front of native agent tools:

artifact -> Read Gate -> Reader Backend -> EvidencePack -> refine / verify / stop

The agent still decides what it needs. SparseRead makes the request bounded, source-anchored, and reversible when native access is the better path.

Results

The current paper evaluation covers 125 tasks, five workload scenarios, and six frontier models: Claude Opus 5, Qwen3.6-Plus, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, DeepSeek-V4-Pro, GLM-5.1, and Kimi-K2.5.

Headline Reported result
Maximum token reduction 92.9%
Maximum wall-time reduction 89.0%
Model–scenario cells with lower tokens and lower time 30 / 30
Cells preserving or improving task score 26 / 30
Sparse-fit cells preserving or improving task score 22 / 24

The gain is not tied to one model: the evaluati