Manuscript Review Skill — AI skill for Claude Code
Claude Code 技能:6位AI专家多智能体学术稿件审阅,生成中英双语彩色批注docx,含评分矩阵与改进优先级.
How to install Manuscript Review Skill
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open Shaowen-Ye/manuscript-review-skill and copy the folder into
~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.
What Manuscript Review Skill does
Claude Code 技能:6位AI专家多智能体学术稿件审阅,生成中英双语彩色批注docx,含评分矩阵与改进优先级。| Claude Code skill: Multi-agent academic manuscript review with 6 expert AI reviewers. Generates bilingual (EN-CN) annotated docx with color-coded critique and scoring matrix.
Alternatives in AI
- Codex Plugin — 's /codex:adversarial-review command 9.6k ★
- Flow Deliver — Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using Codex and Gemini CLIs (Double Diamond Deliver phase) 2.8k ★
- Claudexor — Multi-harness control plane for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode: quota-aware rotation across multiple 425 ★
README
多智能体学术稿件审阅 | Multi-Agent Academic Manuscript Review
一个 [Claude Code](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code) 技能,模拟由6位专家组成的审稿团队,在投稿前对学术稿件进行全面评审。生成中英双语彩色批注 `.docx` 文件,含逐段评审、量化评分矩阵和改进建议优先级排序。
A [Claude Code](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code) skill that simulates a panel of 6 expert reviewers to critique academic manuscripts before journal submission. Generates a bilingual (English-Chinese) annotated `.docx` file with color-coded, section-by-section reviews and a quantitative scoring matrix.
功能概述 | What It Does
输入稿件(docx、PDF 或粘贴文本),即可生成一份专业审稿文档:6位专业AI审稿人逐段点评,每位审稿人按1–10分制打分,评分标准根据目标期刊校准。
Give it a manuscript (docx, PDF, or pasted text), and it produces a professional review document where 6 specialized AI agents critique every section — from Title to Supplementary Materials — each scoring on a 1–10 scale calibrated to your target journal's standards.
6位审稿专家 | The 6-Agent Review Panel
| 代号 Agent | 角色 Role | 审稿重点 Focus |
|---|---|---|
| A | 架构军师 Architecture Strategist | 结构、逻辑链、内部一致性、叙事节奏 Structure, logic chain, internal consistency, narrative flow |
| B | 理论导师 Theory Mentor | 创新性、文献空白、概念精确度、显著性 Novelty, literature gaps, conceptual precision, significance |
| C | 方法统计审稿人 Methods & Stats Reviewer | 统计严谨性、可重复性、效应量、ML可行性 Statistical rigor, reproducibility, effect sizes, ML feasibility |
| D | 应用保护顾问 Application Advisor | 实际相关性、管理建议、政策衔接 Practical relevance, management implications, policy connections |
| E | 期刊主编 Journal Editor | 期刊适配度、格式合规、影响力、竞争定位 Journal fit, formatting compliance, impact, competitive positioning |
| F | 资深合作者 Senior Collaborator | 战略定位、脆弱点评估、未来方向 Strategic positioning, vulnerability assessment, future directions |
可选:**Agent ML** 针对定量密集型论文(高级统计/机器学习专家)。
Optional: **Agent ML** for quantitative-heavy papers (advanced statistics / machine learning specialist).
输出内容 | Output
每个稿件章节包含:
- 中英双语文本展示(英文原文 + 中文翻译)
- 各审稿人彩色标注评审面板
- 逐章评分及评分理由
- 最终评分矩阵表(审稿人 × 章节)
- 改进建议优先级列表(关键 / 重要 / 次要)
Ea
Related Skills
Scholarpeer Econ
Multi-agent peer review simulation for finance and economics manuscripts. Dispatches specialized AI reviewers
Buddhi Review
Automated multi-reviewer pull-request review for Claude Code: fan out AI reviewers, classify findings, guide f
Translate Academic Paper
Translate academic papers & monographs (PDF) into a single self-contained bilingual HTML — Chinese/original/si
ClaudeR
Connect RStudio to Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and other LLM agents via MCP. Multi-agent orchestration, automa
AI Pair Collaboration
/ai-pair, ai pair, dev-team, content-team, team-stopCoordinate heterogeneous AI teams: one creates, two review from different angles. Uses Claude Code's native Ag
Review Pro
Repository-aware AI code review for coding agents — triage → 13 specialist reviewers → synthesis. Reviews what
Related Agents
Cube Project Reviewer
Use this agent to review a pull request against CubeSandbox project-specific conventions and release gates tha
Figure Descriptor
Use this agent when you need to design figures for the manuscript — deciding how many panels a figure needs, w
Academic Editor
Use this agent when you need rigorous academic critique at any phase of the research lifecycle — literature re