Abstract To Concreate Design banner
rizkiridha rizkiridha

Abstract To Concreate Design

Design community

Description

An agentic CLI workflow that moves designers from scattered context to evidence-based design brief — before they open Figma.

Installation

This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no exact command to give. Open the source below and copy the folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.

README

Abstract to Concrete Design

An agentic CLI workflow that moves designers from scattered context to evidence-based design brief — before they open Figma.


The Problem: Scattered Context

Designers face a common challenge:

  • MoMs in Slack threads
  • Research in Notion
  • Stakeholder feedback in email
  • Competitive intel in random docs
  • Design critiques in head

Context lives everywhere. The designer holds it all in their head — or doesn't. Important insights get lost. Decisions get made without full picture.

**This system brings context together, validates understanding, and surfaces gaps — before design begins.**


How It Works

/design:new         → Create project workspace
       ↓
/design:feed        → Paste MoMs, emails, docs, Slack threads
       ↓
/design:validate    → Verify understanding, detect conflicts
       ↓
/design:run         → Run agents (Research → Competitive → Critique)
       ↓
/design:validate    → Validate research synthesis
       ↓
/design:brief       → Get your evidence-based brief
       ↓
Open Figma

The Scattered Context Solution

Before After
MoMs in Slack All context in .design/BRIEF.md
Research in Notion Synthesized in RESEARCH.md
Competitive intel scattered Mapped in COMPETITIVE.md
Feedback in emails Traced to source in BRIEF.md
"What do we know?" Check GAPS.md or run /design:status

Key Features

1. Context Centralization

Paste anything — MoMs, emails, research docs, Slack threads. The system accumulates all context in one place, traceable to source.

2. Validation Gates

Before agents run, validate your understanding:

  • Stakeholder mapping: Who said what?
  • Conflict detection: Do stakeholders contradict each other?
  • Context freshness: How old is this information?

3. Gap Detection

The system surfaces what's missing:

  • No user research data?
  • No engineering constraints?
  • Missing competiti