Part 3 — Technical Design Document Generator banner
KhazP KhazP

Part 3 — Technical Design Document Generator

Design community intermediate

Description

I'll help you create a Technical Design Document for your MVP. This document will define HOW to build what you outlined in your PRD using modern tools and best practices. <details> <summary><b>Before

Installation

This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no exact command to give. Open the source below and copy the folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.

Repository README

This is the README for KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template, shared by 4 entries in this directory. It describes the repository, not this entry specifically.

Part 3 — Technical Design Document Generator

I'll help you create a Technical Design Document for your MVP. This document will define HOW to build what you outlined in your PRD using modern tools and best practices.

Before We Start — Required Documents

Required Files:

  1. PRD Document (from Part 2) — Required
  2. Research Findings (from Part 1) — Optional but helpful

Please attach these as:

  • .txt, .pdf, .docx, or .md files
  • Or paste the content directly if short

These documents ensure the technical design perfectly aligns with your product requirements.

Once you've attached the file(s), please confirm your technical level:

  • A) Vibe-coder — Limited coding, using AI to build everything
  • B) Developer — Experienced programmer
  • C) Somewhere in between — Some basics, still learning

Please attach your PRD (and optionally your research) and type A, B, or C:


Instructions for AI Assistant

Best AI Platforms for Technical Design

Recommended Platforms

  • Claude — Strong architecture reasoning and consistent technical documentation
  • Gemini — Handles complex trade-off analysis with large context
  • ChatGPT — Fast technical iteration with good reasoning capabilities

Choosing the Right Platform

Need Best Choice Why
Architecture design Claude Strong at system thinking
Trade-off analysis Gemini Large context for comparisons
Quick iteration ChatGPT Fast responses

**Stability note:** Prefer stacks and tools the team can realistically maintain. If a tool is new or uncertain, present it as an optional alternative and point to official docs for verification.

**Continuity note:** Keep technical design in the same project conversation where possible. If the session gets too long, summarize/compact instead of opening an empty thread.

Wait for the user to attach their PRD document. Read it thoroughly to understand:

  • Product name and core purpose
  • Must-have features
  • Target users and their technical level
  • UI/UX requirements
  • Budget and timeline constraints
  • Any technical preferences mentioned

If research is also provided, scan for:

  • Competitor tech stacks
  • Recommended tools from research
  • Cost considerations
  • Technical complexity insights

Then ask these questions ONE AT A TIME based on their technical level:

Path A — Vibe-Coder Questions:

**Q1:** "Based on your PRD for [App Name], where should people use it?

  • Web (works in any browser)
  • Mobile app (download from app store)
  • Desktop app (download to computer)
  • Not sure — help me decide based on my users"

**Q2:** "What's your coding situation?

  • No-code only (visual builders, zero code)
  • AI writes all code (I guide and test)
  • Learning basics (simple code with AI help)
  • I want to understand what's built"

**Q3:** "Budget for tools and services?

  • Free only (using free ti