More Than Human Skills — Development skill for Claude Code
Agentic skills and commands for checking whether what we build serves all living things — not just humans.
How to install More Than Human Skills
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open Owl-Listener/more-than-human-skills and copy the folder into
~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.
What More Than Human Skills does
Agentic skills and commands for checking whether what we build serves all living things — not just humans.
Alternatives in Development
- Agentic Sop To Work — Turn human SOPs into deterministic, gated agentic workflows — a Claude Code plugin 205 ★
- Claude Skills CLI — 🤖 CLI for creating Claude Agent Skills with progressive disclosure validation 85 ★
- Pwc CLI — A Command-Line Interface (CLI) and Skill to interact with Papers with Code 84 ★
README
More-Than-Human Skills
Agentic skills and commands for checking whether what we build serves all living things — not just humans.
**14 skills and 3 commands across 1 plugin.**
Why this exists
Design has a boundary baked into its vocabulary. A *user* is a human. A *stakeholder* is a human with budget. Everything else — the animals in the supply chain a recommender optimises, the watershed a datacentre draws from, the species whose habitat a mapping tool makes legible for clearing — is an externality by construction.
It isn't that teams decide against non-human life. It's that no step in the process asks. There is no slot in a design review, a PRD, or a launch checklist where a river or a barn owl could come up, so it doesn't.
This repo is an attempt at that slot.
It draws on work that already exists and is rarely applied in product teams: **more-than-human design** (Wakkary, Forlano), **animal-computer interaction** (Mancini), multispecies ethnography, and the environmental-computing literature on the energy, water, and material cost of machine learning.
What stops it being decoration
This genre collapses into virtue signalling in about a page. Three commitments hold it open:
**Name specific beings, not "nature."** "Migratory birds along the Atlantic flyway" is auditable. "The environment" isn't. Every stakeholder entry has to be specific enough that someone could go and check it.
**Quantify with honest proxies.** kWh, litres, hectares — stated as ranges, with the measurement boundary attached, and with uncertainty admitted rather than smoothed. Not a five-point vibes score.
**Force a decision.** Every finding ends in a change to the product, or it gets logged as accepted harm with a named individual attached. There is no third option and no composite score, because a score is how a decision gets made without anyone making it.
The four lenses
| Lens | Question | Skills |
|---|---|---|
| Who is affected | Which living things does this to |
Related Skills
Assistant Agent
You are Aurora's assistant — a friendly but persistent personal assistant living in #tasks. You track what nee
Claude Jam
Share one real Claude Code session with other humans — attributed messages, human-only side channel, live mirr
App Learn
Mine a shipped app's conventions into the living House Knowledge Base — adds net-new learnings to knowledge/.m
Acceptance Review
You are an independent reviewer checking whether a change meets its
New Story
Begin by checking whether a title was passed as an argument ("$ARGUMENTS").
Make Agent Friendly
Prepare a human-developed codebase for agentic development
Related Agents
Spec Kit Partner
A truly conversational, adaptive, and agentic subagent that partners with humans to co-create rigorous, multi-
PR Fix Agent
Fix STP/STD documents based on PR review comments from humans or bots. Classifies comments as auto-fixable or
SEO AI Access Checker
Checks whether AI and search crawlers can actually reach a URL, and whether its content is in the served HTML