Superb Prompt — Code Quality skill for Claude Code
A Claude skill that builds or fixes prompts using the five-part framework (role, task, context, constraints, format), names the reader, asks for one insight, and checks every prompt against a nine-poi.
How to install Superb Prompt
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open nataliachalmers/superb-prompt and copy the folder into
~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.
What Superb Prompt does
A Claude skill that builds or fixes prompts using the five-part framework (role, task, context, constraints, format), names the reader, asks for one insight, and checks every prompt against a nine-point "superb test" before it goes out.
Alternatives in Code Quality
- Import Drawio — Redraw a draw.io file as an editorial diagram at a chosen format, size, and detail level 27.2k ★
- Job Stories — Create job stories with acceptance criteria in JTBD format 7.8k ★
- Video Script: Claude SEO V1.7.2 — What's New — Duration: ~5 minutes Tone: Natural, conversational, like talking to a friend who knows Claude Code Format: Scr 5k ★
README
superb-prompt
A Claude skill that builds or fixes prompts using the five-part framework (role, task, context, constraints, format), names the reader, asks for one insight, and checks every prompt against a nine-point "superb test" before it goes out.
A good prompt gets a correct answer. A superb prompt also gets an answer that is written for a named reader and tells that reader something they didn't already know. Every prompt this skill writes does both.
What it does
- Fills in the five parts from what you said, what you attached, and what Claude knows of your work: role, task, context, constraints, format. Anything it can't know gets a
[BRACKETED]placeholder rather than an invented fact. - Names the audience in a way that changes how the AI writes: their title, what they already know, and the decision they face. "For leadership" is weak; "for a health plan Chief Dental Officer deciding which coordination program to fund next year" is strong.
- Adds exactly one insight request, the "so what" that pushes past a summary into judgment. Reformat prompts get none, on purpose: a formatting prompt should change only the layout.
- Matches the prompt type, each with its must-haves and a template: summarize, role-based, reformat, compare/contrast, evaluate. Real tasks often combine two.
- Runs the superb test before delivering: task verb, role, audience, content, format, constraints, insight, accuracy anchoring (citations required whenever facts, numbers or policy are involved), length.
- Pre-empts weak output with two or three follow-ups drawn from a diagnosis table: too generic, off-tone, hard to use, hallucinated, shallow, wrong reader, and the fix for each.
Four modes
| Mode | What you give it | What comes back |
|---|---|---|
| A. Build | A rough request | A quick (1–2 sentence) prompt, or a full version in two forms: structured (five labeled parts) and narrative (2–3 paragraphs) |
| B. Review | An existing prompt, optionally with |
Related Skills
Marketing Setup
Asks the 4 setup questions and saves task priority, content types, audience, tone, and output-format defaults
Coordinate Agents
Run one coordination sweep across live weftspun agents — snapshot the Bao KV agents/ store, notify each live p
Claude Faf MCP
Persistent Project Context for Claude — IANA-registered .faf format · 32 tools + 1 prompt · MCP Registry #2759
Prompt Integrity Validator
Lint Your Prompts, Ship Better Agents – Prompt Refiner 2026 Rule Engine
Workflow Eval
Evaluate the workflow — deterministic lint over the instruction files plus an optional scored live run of /new
ExecuteTask
Phase 6 — implement tasks in order, choosing the loop (core / red-green-refactor / prompt-iteration) per task;
Related Agents
Skills Guide
Interactive guide for building custom Claude Skills. Asks straightforward questions, uses SKILLS_FACTORY_PROMP
Typesafe Adversary
Red-teams TypeSafe integrations before users do. Probes the nine documented Jev failure modes, tests prompt in
Klein Method Scholar
Gate 2 (METHOD) worker for Klein Auto Research — writes the five-part method_card.md (intuition → math → minim