Nanako0129

Lorenzini — Git skill for Claude Code

Git community

Claude Code skills that wait for a third-party PR reviewer and decide whether its verdict actually means pass.

How to install Lorenzini

This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no exact command to give. Open Nanako0129/lorenzini and copy the folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.

What Lorenzini does

Claude Code skills that wait for a third-party PR reviewer and decide whether its verdict actually means pass.

Alternatives in Git

Fix PR — by metabase - Fetches and fixes unresolved PR comments by automatically retrieving feedback, addressing review 46.5k ★
Loki Verify — Run Loki's deterministic PR verification on the current change and summarize the evidence verdict 1.1k ★
Final Pass — look at the git branch we are on to see what we have been working on 200 ★

README

lorenzini

Claude Code skills that wait for a third-party pull-request reviewer and decide whether its verdict actually means *pass*.

A shark's ampullae of Lorenzini are electroreceptors: they find prey buried in sand, where there is nothing to see. That is what these skills are for. Every reviewer so far has reported findings in places its own count ignores, and every bug in this repository has been the same mistake — treating "I cannot see a problem" as "there is no problem".

What is here

Skill	Reviewer	Status
`coderabbit-review-wait`	CodeRabbit (`coderabbitai[bot]`)	Active on repositories with 10 stars or more
`copilot-review-wait`	GitHub Copilot (`copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot]`)	Active on repositories under 10 stars
`codex-review-wait`	Codex (`chatgpt-codex-connector`)	Dormant since 2026-09-17, subscription paused

The CodeRabbit/Copilot split is a vendor constraint, not a preference: CodeRabbit's OSS tier requires a public repository with fewer than ten stars to have its reviews triggered by hand, so those repositories moved to Copilot. Check which applies with `gh api repos/OWNER/NAME -q .stargazers_count` rather than assuming.

Each skill polls until a verdict lands on the current head commit and prints one machine-readable `RESULT=` line. They do not review code; they adjudicate what a reviewer said about it.

Install

Symlink into `~/.claude/skills/`:

git clone git@github.com:Nanako0129/lorenzini.git ~/side-project/lorenzini
for s in codex copilot coderabbit; do
  ln -s ~/side-project/lorenzini/$s-review-wait ~/.claude/skills/$s-review-wait
done

Requires `gh` (authenticated) and `jq`.

The one rule

**Never infer a pass from absence.**

A verdict requires an explicit positive completion marker. No marker means keep polling — not "nothing found, therefore clean". Five separate bugs have come from breaking thi