Agentic Consensus Swarm — Development skill for Claude Code
Multi-agent consensus demo — 5 agents independently answer the same question in parallel with distinct reasoning lenses, then a synthesizer agent reconciles their responses into one final answer, show.
How to install Agentic Consensus Swarm
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open JustinLaSalle/Agentic-consensus-swarm and copy the folder into
~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.
What Agentic Consensus Swarm does
Multi-agent consensus demo — 5 agents independently answer the same question in parallel with distinct reasoning lenses, then a synthesizer agent reconciles their responses into one final answer, showing where they agreed and diverged.
Alternatives in Development
- Ars Revision — ARS academic-paper revision mode — revised draft + R&R responses 4.5k ★
- Claude Token Efficient — One CLAUDE.md file 3.8k ★
- Cq — An open standard for shared agent learning 1.3k ★
README
Consensus Swarm
A multi-agent consensus demo — 5 agents independently answer the same question in parallel, with no visibility into each other's reasoning, and a synthesizer agent reconciles their responses into one final answer. Built with the [Claude API](https://docs.claude.com).
Live demo
**[Try it here](https://claude.ai/artifact/Usqfs4eH2g7yabwUrSHSXo)** — note: trying the interactive part requires a free Claude account to sign in with (a platform requirement for any page that calls Claude live, not specific to this project).
The problem
Hard judgment calls — should we do X or Y, what's the biggest risk here, which option is right — often benefit from more than one perspective. A single model, asked once, gives you one take. This project explores a different pattern: ask several independent "agents" the same question with different reasoning lenses, see where they actually agree versus genuinely diverge, and let a synthesizer produce a final answer grounded in that spread rather than a single unexamined take.
This mirrors, at small scale, a real pattern used in large multi-agent research systems — independent parallel attempts at the same problem, reconciled afterward — rather than one long chain of sequential reasoning (the pattern used in this portfolio's companion project, [Agent Crew](../agent-crew)).
What it does
- 5 agents run in true parallel, each given the same question but a distinct reasoning lens — cautious/risk-first, bold/unconventional, data-and-numbers-first, customer-first, long-term-consequences-first — so they produce genuinely different attempts rather than near-identical restatements
- Each agent's answer appears as soon as it's ready, independently, with no agent able to see another's response
- A synthesizer agent reviews all 5 and reports, honestly, how much they actually agreed (high / mixed / low) — not just averaging them
- A final consensus answer is produced, grounded in what the 5 agents actu
Related Skills
Health Reasoning
Claude Code skill: the reasoning standard an assistant holds in health conversations. A seven-question check o
Ettle
Your agent and your teammates' agents, comparing notes before the meeting would have happened. ettle reconcile
Bug Race
Use when a bug has already survived at least one debugging attempt and you have 2-3 genuinely distinct root-ca
Census
Reconcile corpus populations, distinct vulnerabilities, and duplication across findings trees.
0x002132 Skills Bugbounty Hunt Ato
Hunt account takeover taxonomy — 9 distinct paths to ATO, plus chains. Paths: (1) password reset flaws (host h
Build Recap
Generate a delta-since-last-recap summary of a product's build progress. Distinct from /recollect (which recon
Related Agents
Corp Final Fable
A /corp FINAL-GATE seat on Fable at max effort (two per final gate, distinct lenses): the last read of the fin
Consensus Synthesizer
Reads all validator reports, applies consensus-synthesis voting rules, handles disagreements via consensus-dis
UX Research Synthesizer
Synthesizes user interviews, survey responses, support tickets, or other user research into themes, patterns,