Scholarpeer Econ — AI skill for Claude Code
Multi-agent peer review simulation for finance and economics manuscripts.
How to install Scholarpeer Econ
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open franklee16/scholarpeer-econ and copy the folder into
~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.
What Scholarpeer Econ does
Multi-agent peer review simulation for finance and economics manuscripts. Dispatches specialized AI reviewers (econometrician, domain expert, methodologist) to evaluate papers and generates consensus reports.
Alternatives in AI
- Codex Plugin — 's /codex:adversarial-review command 9.6k ★
- Fast Agent — Code, Build and Evaluate agents - excellent Model and Skills/MCP/ACP Support 3.7k ★
- Define — Definition phase - Clarify and scope problems with multi-AI consensus 2.8k ★
README
ScholarPeer-Econ
**Multi-Agent Peer Review Simulation for Finance and Economics Manuscripts**
Overview
ScholarPeer-Econ simulates a journal peer review panel by dispatching multiple specialized AI reviewer agents in parallel. Each reviewer evaluates your manuscript from their expertise perspective, then a discussion phase synthesizes findings into a consensus report with actionable recommendations.
Installation
Clone this repository into your Claude Code skills directory:
cd ~/.claude/skills/ git clone https://github.com/yourusername/scholarpeer-econ.gitThe skill will be automatically available in Claude Code.
Usage
In Claude Code, invoke the skill:
/scholarpeer-econ path/to/manuscript.docx
With journal targeting:
/scholarpeer-econ paper/main.tex --journal JF
How It Works
Reviewer Personas
| Persona | Focus Area |
|---|---|
| Econometrician | Identification strategy, causality, specification, standard errors |
| Domain Expert | Literature positioning, contribution, institutional context |
| Methodologist | Data quality, measurement validity, replication potential |
Process
- Phase 1: Setup — Read manuscript, select reviewer personas, load journal profile
- Phase 2: Independent Review — Dispatch 2-3 reviewers in parallel (blind to each other)
- Phase 3: Discussion — Identify disagreements, facilitate resolution
- Phase 4: Consensus Report — Synthesize into unified assessment with scores
Scoring
Overall score aligned with quality gate system:
- ≥95: Ready for submission
- 90-94: Minor revisions needed
- 80-89: Major revisions needed
- <80: Fundamental issues require rethinking
Output
Reports saved to `quality_reports/reviews/`:
- Individual reviewer reports
- Consensus report with actionable recommendations
- Required revisions checklist
Supported Formats
.docx(Word documents).tex(LaTeX manuscrip
Related Skills
Ensemble
Multi-model consensus debate via the filesystem. LLMs propose, peer-review, rebut, vote and synthesize a group
Manuscript Review Skill
Claude Code 技能:6位AI专家多智能体学术稿件审阅,生成中英双语彩色批注docx,含评分矩阵与改进优先级。 Claude Code skill: Multi-agent academic manuscript
Lad MCP Server
Lad MCP Server: Autonomous code & system design review for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, etc.)
Peer Review
Multi-LLM peer review skill for Claude Code — send plans to Codex and Gemini for structured feedback with cros
Multi Model Peer Review
Claude Code skill: independent peer review of your specs and plans by Codex, Gemini, and open-weight models (D
Reviewer Alignment Forum
You are a peer reviewer in the style of the AI Alignment Forum / LessWrong — specifically, a reviewer who has
Related Agents
Econ Reviewer
Top-journal economics referee. Reviews papers and slides for identification strategy, econometric specificatio
Econometrician
Causal inference critic and gatekeeper for identification validity. Reviews strategy memos and papers through
Science Writer
Expert scientific writer and editor for publication-quality manuscripts, revision strategy, peer review, and r