Scholarpeer Econ — AI skill for Claude Code
Multi-agent peer review simulation for finance and economics manuscripts.
How to install Scholarpeer Econ
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open franklee16/scholarpeer-econ and copy the folder into
~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.
What Scholarpeer Econ does
Multi-agent peer review simulation for finance and economics manuscripts. Dispatches specialized AI reviewers (econometrician, domain expert, methodologist) to evaluate papers and generates consensus reports.
Alternatives in AI
- Codex Plugin — 's /codex:adversarial-review command 9.6k ★
- Fast Agent — Code, Build and Evaluate agents - excellent Model and Skills/MCP/ACP Support 3.7k ★
- Claude Skills LLM Council — LLM Council — a Claude Code skill that runs your decisions through 5 AI advisors with peer review 1.7k ★
README
ScholarPeer-Econ
**Multi-Agent Peer Review Simulation for Finance and Economics Manuscripts**
Overview
ScholarPeer-Econ simulates a journal peer review panel by dispatching multiple specialized AI reviewer agents in parallel. Each reviewer evaluates your manuscript from their expertise perspective, then a discussion phase synthesizes findings into a consensus report with actionable recommendations.
Installation
Clone this repository into your Claude Code skills directory:
cd ~/.claude/skills/ git clone https://github.com/yourusername/scholarpeer-econ.gitThe skill will be automatically available in Claude Code.
Usage
In Claude Code, invoke the skill:
/scholarpeer-econ path/to/manuscript.docx
With journal targeting:
/scholarpeer-econ paper/main.tex --journal JF
How It Works
Reviewer Personas
| Persona | Focus Area |
|---|---|
| Econometrician | Identification strategy, causality, specification, standard errors |
| Domain Expert | Literature positioning, contribution, institutional context |
| Methodologist | Data quality, measurement validity, replication potential |
Process
- Phase 1: Setup — Read manuscript, select reviewer personas, load journal profile
- Phase 2: Independent Review — Dispatch 2-3 reviewers in parallel (blind to each other)
- Phase 3: Discussion — Identify disagreements, facilitate resolution
- Phase 4: Consensus Report — Synthesize into unified assessment with scores
Scoring
Overall score aligned with quality gate system:
- ≥95: Ready for submission
- 90-94: Minor revisions needed
- 80-89: Major revisions needed
- <80: Fundamental issues require rethinking
Output
Reports saved to `quality_reports/reviews/`:
- Individual reviewer reports
- Consensus report with actionable recommendations
- Required revisions checklist
Supported Formats
.docx(Word documents).tex(LaTeX manuscrip
Related Skills
Ensemble
Multi-model consensus debate via the filesystem. LLMs propose, peer-review, rebut, vote and synthesize a group
Econ DataKnowhow
An AI-maintained knowledge base that maps economics research ideas to the best empirical datasets and executab
Econ Academic Figures
Claude Code skill / Python toolkit for academic-style economics paper figures (Times New Roman, coefficient pl
Reef
A harness framework for building domain-specific agents, the worked finance instance that beats every frontier
Reviewer Alignment Forum
You are a peer reviewer in the style of the AI Alignment Forum / LessWrong — specifically, a reviewer who has
AI Pair Collaboration
/ai-pair, ai pair, dev-team, content-team, team-stopCoordinate heterogeneous AI teams: one creates, two review from different angles. Uses Claude Code's native Ag
Related Agents
Econ Finance Theorist
Use this agent when you need rigorous theoretical modeling in economics or finance, including developing forma
Econ Reviewer
Top-journal economics referee. Reviews papers and slides for identification strategy, econometric specificatio
Econometrician
Causal inference critic and gatekeeper for identification validity. Reviews strategy memos and papers through