B2B AI FDE Contract Counsel banner
FangkeJiang FangkeJiang

B2B AI FDE Contract Counsel

AI community

Description

Four-lens contract counsel for AI B2B deals — legal, regulatory, finance/tax, commercial. A Claude Code skill for drafting and reviewing AI/SaaS commercial contracts in Chinese, English or bilingual form.

Installation

This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no exact command to give. Open the source below and copy the folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.

README

AI Contract Counsel

A [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) skill that drafts, reviews and redlines **B2B commercial contracts for AI and software businesses** — in Chinese, English or bilingual form.

It works as a four-person panel rather than a single reviewer. Every draft is run past a **global legal counsel**, a **regulatory & compliance expert**, a **CFO/finance & tax reviewer**, and a **commercial deal lead**, independently, before their findings are reconciled into one ranked list. The four disagree on purpose — a term that delights your lawyer often loses your finance team money.

It starts by interviewing you: what your AI product does, how you price it, who measures the numbers you invoice against, where the money crosses borders. Then it works from that profile instead of generic contract boilerplate.

你: /ai-contract-counsel 帮我看看这份合同
它: 先问 6 个问题 → 生成 Deal Profile → 四重视角审查 → 按严重度排序的风险清单 + 可粘贴的修改条款

Why this exists

AI contracts fail in ways that ordinary software contracts don't:

  • The price is derived from an assumption that nobody made binding. A per-unit rate calculated from an expected monthly volume, with a clause elsewhere confirming that the volume is "a planning figure only" creating no minimum obligation. The vendor has agreed, in writing, that it cannot complain when volume lands at a third of the assumption.
  • The billable event is measured inside the counterparty's systems. Per-conversion pricing where their CRM decides what counts, with no tie-breaker when the two sides' numbers disagree.
  • A rate card is referenced but never attached. The fee clause points to an annex for unit prices and the annex is not in the document. Every monthly invoice becomes a negotiation.
  • Training rights get silently deleted or silently granted in a redline, because both sides' lawyers treat it as a legal term when it is a product-roadmap decision.
  • The heading says one thing and the operative verb says the other