Jidoka Debate — Development skill for Claude Code
Run an adversarial debate (prosecutor/defender/judge) on an analytical or decision question.
How to install Jidoka Debate
Installs to ~/.claude/commands/contact715-jidoka-jidoka-debate.md
mkdir -p ~/.claude/commands && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/contact715/jidoka/HEAD/.claude/commands/jidoka-debate.md -o ~/.claude/commands/contact715-jidoka-jidoka-debate.md Restart Claude Code, or start a new session, for it to be picked up.
What Jidoka Debate does
description: Run an adversarial debate (prosecutor/defender/judge) on an analytical or decision question argument-hint: allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Agent
Adversarial analysis of: $ARGUMENTS
- Route it:
node scripts/debate-trigger.mjs --task '{"prompt":"$ARGUMENTS"}'(in a product use.jidoka/scripts/). It says whether this warrants a debate and which mode (full / panel / none). - If full: dispatch two INDEPENDENT, repo-grounded agen
Alternatives in Development
- 3 Designer Debate — 3-designer-debate 1k ★
- Kaizen — Applies continuous improvement methodology with multiple analytical approaches, based on Japanese Kaizen philo 663 ★
- Extraction Judge.Prompt — Extraction Judge — Fact Durability Rubric 189 ★
Full documentation available on GitHub
View Source RepositoryRelated Skills
Muse:Debate
Run a 3-round adversarial debate between two personas on a question. Round 1 is opening statements, Round 2 is
Cmd Judge
Adversarial verifier for the PROVE phase: treats a finished-work report as untrusted claims, re-runs every ver
Trading Analysis
Multi-agent trading analysis for a stock ticker. Runs technical, news, fundamentals, and macro analysts in par
Herdr Council
herdr plugin: ask every coding agent the same question, then let a judge weigh the answers blind
Quorum
Run an adversarial multi-perspective quorum over a question or artifact
10 10 10 Dtd
Judge a decision at ten minutes, ten months and ten years, naming the horizon where the sign flips
Related Agents
Debate Prosecutor
L0.97 Adversarial Verification — reads diff + spec + test results, constructs the strongest-case argument that
Kavach Chamber
KAVACH review-chamber judge. Orchestrates a bounded adversarial debate between kavach-ideator, kavach-tracer,
Swarm Judge
Opus-tier judge for research swarms — adversarial verification adjudication, cross-lens synthesis, plan critiq