Context Steward — AI skill for Claude Code
Load skills dynamically.
How to install Context Steward
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open BouletteProof/context-steward and copy the folder into
~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.
What Context Steward does
Load skills dynamically. Learn what works. Works with any LLM. MCP server for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and Cursor.
Alternatives in AI
- Firecrawl MCP Server — 🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM c 6.1k ★
- Jcodemunch MCP — Cut AI token costs 95%+ on code exploration 2.6k ★
- Metaharness — 🛠️ The meta-harness for AI agents — scaffold your own focused, branded agent harness with its own npx CLI, MC 616 ★
README
context-steward
**Load skills dynamically. Learn what works. Works with any LLM.**
MCP server for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and Cursor.
The problem
You have 10 skill files. Your agent loads all of them into the system prompt. That's 15,000 tokens burned before the task starts — whether the agent reads them or not.
On a 32K model, that's 47% of your context gone. And you have no idea which skills actually help.
How it works
Lazy loading
Skills are MCP tools. Zero skill content in the initial prompt.
When your agent hits a task, it calls:
load_skills({ task: "refactor the auth module" })
context-steward finds the relevant skill, returns it with a `contextId`, and content enters context only when needed — right before generation. The `contextId` is a handle: pass it back later to link outcome feedback to the specific skill that was used.
Feedback loop
After the task, report what happened — not a score:
report_outcome({
contextId: "abc123",
signal: "praised",
notes: "Clean decomposition, all types correct, user said 'perfect'"
})
**Signals** are observable conversation events:
| Signal | When to use | Derived score |
|---|---|---|
praised |
User explicitly said good/great/perfect | 0.95 |
used_as_is |
User accepted and moved to the next topic | 0.70 |
revised |
User asked for specific changes | 0.40 |
rejected |
User said no, start over, dismissed output | 0.15 |
redone_by_user |
User did it themselves after seeing the attempt | 0.10 |
Why signals instead of scores? Because a model scoring its own work is unreliable — it will always be generous with itself. Signals are binary observations: did the user accept it or not? Did they ask for changes or not? No subjectivity in the observation.
The "derived score" column is a deterministic mapping used only for aggregation and ranking. It's not a judgment; it's a sort key.
Over time, skills accumulate signal history:
$ context-stewa
Related Skills
Taw Computer
Give any AI a real computer. Open source MCP server with Ubuntu sandbox, browser automation, desktop control,
Localwp Agent Tools
A Local add-on that provides an MCP server, skills, and project context for AI-powered WordPress development.
Mynd
Persistent memory MCP server for AI coding agents. Injects project context at session start, stores architectu
Rustygrep
Fast grep with token-compressed, AI-native output for LLM coding agents. --llm cuts context-window tokens 60-9
Hn MCP
Hacker News MCP server for Claude Desktop & AI assistants. Browse HN stories, search posts, read comments, ana
Handup
The approval inbox for AI agents. Approve, deny or answer from your terminal, desktop or phone. Works with Cla
Related Agents
Pbi Dax
DAX specialist for the Power BI Desktop project currently open. Writes, validates, tests and optimizes measure
LLM MCP
Engineer of redbar's AI surface — the MCP server, the handoff that hands the gap to the agent to write the tes
Act 3 Pivot
Read-only narrative steward for Act III (slide 15) — the pivot slide that turns the deck from workflows to age