abhisha23

Fraud Detection Using Agentic AI — AI skill for Claude Code

AI community

AI-powered insurance claims fraud detection agent — combines a Random Forest classifier for risk scoring with Claude as an agentic explanation layer that reasons over flagged risk factors and generate.

How to install Fraud Detection Using Agentic AI

This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no exact command to give. Open abhisha23/Fraud-Detection-using-Agentic-AI and copy the folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or the file into ~/.claude/agents/.

What Fraud Detection Using Agentic AI does

AI-powered insurance claims fraud detection agent — combines a Random Forest classifier for risk scoring with Claude as an agentic explanation layer that reasons over flagged risk factors and generates plain-language justifications for claims adjusters.

Alternatives in AI

  • Geo SEO Claude — GEO-first SEO skill for Claude Code 3.6k ★
  • Flow Deliver — Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using Codex and Gemini CLIs (Double Diamond Deliver phase) 2.8k ★
  • Academic Humanizer — Strip AI-writing tells from papers and grant proposals (NSF/NIH), while keeping scholarly voice and tying clai 1.1k ★

README

🛡️ Insurance Claims Fraud Detection Agent

An AI-powered fraud detection system that combines a traditional machine learning classifier with an LLM-based agentic reasoning layer — built to explore how structured ML predictions and generative AI can work together in a real-world insurance workflow.

What it does

  1. A claims adjuster (or automated intake system) enters structured claim details — amount, policy tenure, prior claims history, filing delay, claim type, provider, and member age.
  2. A Random Forest classifier scores the claim's fraud risk based on patterns learned from historical claims data. 3.Claude (Anthropic)acts as an agentic explanation layer — it takes the model's risk score and the specific triggered risk factors, reasons over them, and produces a clear, plain-language justification a human adjuster can actually act on, along with a recommended next step.

The goal is a system where the ML model handles pattern detection at scale, and the LLM agent handles the human-facing reasoning and communication — each doing what it's best at.


Architecture

Claim Input (Streamlit form)
        │
        ▼
Random Forest Classifier ──► Fraud Risk Score (%)
        │
        ▼
Risk Factor Detection (rule-based thresholds)
        │
        ▼
Claude API (agentic reasoning) ──► Plain-language explanation + recommended action
        │
        ▼
Displayed to the adjuster in the UI

Tech Stack

Layer Tool
ML Model Scikit-learn (Random Forest, class-balanced)
Agentic Reasoning Anthropic Claude API
Frontend Streamlit
Data Synthetic claims dataset (5,000 records, ~3% fraud rate)

Why these choices?

  • Random Forest — robust to the class imbalance inherent in real fraud detection (fraud is rare), and its feature importances give interpretable risk signals to feed into the explanation layer.
  • Claude as the reasoning layer — rather than hard-coding explanation templates, an LLM can