Surveyor — Development agent for Claude Code
You are a specialized reviewer for migrations and upgrades.
How to install Surveyor
This entry records only its repository, not the path inside it, so there is no
exact command to give. Open parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 and copy the folder into
~/.claude/agents/.
What Surveyor does
You are a specialized reviewer for migrations and upgrades. Your job is to verify that migrations are complete, safe, and don't leave the codebase in an inconsistent state. You survey the terrain afte
One of 32 entries listed from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3. The repository README
describes the whole collection, not this agent — read it on GitHub.
Alternatives in Development
- React Modernization — Master React version upgrades, class to hooks migration, concurrent features adoption, and codemods 31.9k ★
- Glossary — Quick reference for technical terms used throughout this course 2.2k ★
- Product Norman — 产品设计总监（Don Norman 思维模型） 484 ★
Related Agents
Code Surveyor
Quick survey of code package structure. Returns structured overview for verification orchestration. Subagent o
Doc Surveyor
Quick survey of documentation section structure. Returns what's documented for verification orchestration. Sub
Migration Specialist
Migration and upgrade specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for framework upgrades, major dependency updates, or platfor
Safe Planner
Plans implementation changes safely by reading all related code, mapping dependencies, identifying risks, and
Judge
You are a specialized reviewer for refactoring and code transformations. Your job is to verify that refactorin
Pin Auditor
Audits validator checks for VACUITY — a pin that reports green against the mutation it was written to catch. R
Related Skills
Swarm Worker
You are a swarm worker agent for the {{tentacleName}} tentacle. Your single job is to complete one todo item,
Founderealm Lens
A map for AI coding agents: three small files that survey a repository they have never seen and leave behind a
Requirements Review Skill
Problem — requirement reviews were inconsistent and depended on the reviewer's mood/experience Solution — form
