Evidence Judge — Development agent for Claude Code
../../agents/evidence-judge.md.
How to install Evidence Judge
Installs to ~/.claude/agents/jacksongeiger-claude_upgrade-evidence-judge.md
mkdir -p ~/.claude/agents && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jacksongeiger/Claude_Upgrade/HEAD/.claude/agents/evidence-judge.md -o ~/.claude/agents/jacksongeiger-claude_upgrade-evidence-judge.md Restart Claude Code, or start a new session, for it to be picked up.
What Evidence Judge does
A personal Claude Code configuration kit: a global `CLAUDE.md`, reusable slash-command prompts, per-stack `CLAUDE.md` templates, and a git pre-push hook. The goal is to make Claude Code behave consistently across projects — concise communication, feasibility-first workflow, clean secrets/dependency
Alternatives in Development
- Owner Judge — Reviews proposed changes to VoiceStudio against the owner's documented standards 41.3k ★
- Judge — You are a specialized reviewer for refactoring and code transformations 3.6k ★
- Mathodology Award Judge — Use for one independent blind judge seat scoring an award-level submission against contest rubric criteria 137 ★
Repository README
This is the README for jacksongeiger/Claude_Upgrade, shared by 6 entries
in this directory. It describes the repository, not this entry specifically.
Claude_Upgrade
A personal Claude Code configuration kit: a global `CLAUDE.md`, reusable slash-command prompts, per-stack `CLAUDE.md` templates, and a git pre-push hook. The goal is to make Claude Code behave consistently across projects — concise communication, feasibility-first workflow, clean secrets/dependency hygiene, and disciplined documentation.
Structure
Claude_Upgrade/
CLAUDE.md # global instructions for Claude Code
install.sh # one-shot setup: symlinks everything into ~/.claude/
commands/ # slash commands (each file is the full prompt)
jg-feasibility.md (retired: points at /jg-validate)
jg-review.md
jg-changelog.md
jg-status.md
jg-review-approach.md
templates/
CLAUDE.general.md # generic per-project template
CLAUDE.python.md # Python project template
CLAUDE.nextjs.md # Next.js project template
hooks/
pre-push # warn before pushing to main
CHANGELOG.md
DEAD_ENDS.md
README.md
All command files are prefixed `jg-` so they don't collide with built-in Claude Code commands or skills of the same name (`/review`, `/status`, etc.). Invoke them as `/jg-validate`, `/jg-spec`, and so on.
Setup
git clone ~/Claude_Upgrade
cd ~/Claude_Upgrade
./install.sh
`install.sh` symlinks the following into `~/.claude/`:
CLAUDE.md→~/.claude/CLAUDE.md- each
commands/*.md→~/.claude/commands/(every/jg-*and/ard, in every project) - each
agents/*.md→~/.claude/agents/(persona, reviewer, executors, judges)
Then `./install.sh --check` says what the machine still lacks, with the fix for each line. For UI projects the persona, screenshot and lighthouse pieces need `npm install -g playwright lighthouse && npx playwright install chromium`; `./install.sh --discovery` sets up rdx. Re-run `./install.sh` after pulling a version that added commands or agents: symlinks are per file, so a new file is not linked until then.
Because these are symlinks, any edit you make in the repo is live everywhere immediately — no re-installing. Re-running `install.sh` is safe: it skips links that already point to the right place, replaces stale links, and refuses to overwrite real files.
Nightshift — the unattended improvement loop
`loop/` is a system that improves a project for hours on a hard cost cap while you sleep, and cannot touch `main`. Fable plans and reviews; Sonnet (Opus for hard tasks) executes in isolated git worktrees; a **script, never a model,** measures the result and decides whether to keep it.
/jg-loop init # once per project, with you present: goals, scoreboard, backlog
/jg-loop dryrun # one supervised iteration at a small cap; proves the cost meter
/jg-loop start --cap 40 --hours 6
/jg-loop status # or just glance at the statusline
/jg-loop review # the morning digest, in plain English
What you see, always, at the bottom of the terminal:
● loop/2026-09-16 · iter 7 · EXEC · score 71.4 ▲2.1 (best 71.4) ▁▂▃▅▆▇ · flat 0/3 · rung 1 · $18.40/$40 ▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮░
The one rule everything hangs on: **a row without a scoreboard dimension is not a candidate.** The loop picks the dimension furthest from target, then the first row for it; it climbs a ladder (backlog → unfinished threads → hypotheses → ask you) only when the rung below is empty; flat or regressed iterations are reset, never kept; and the scorers live outside the worktree so an executor cannot edit its own judge.
Design and the failure modes it was tested against: `loop/README.md` is the contract; the design pages are linked from the CHANGELOG.
The project pipeline — idea to Nightshift
`pipeline/` puts six commands on one spine, `spec.json`, and reuses every Nightshift part (agents, worktrees, guards, allowlist, cost meter, merge):
/jg-spec # the interview: every wish becomes a check; you sign the spec
/jg-tools # gaps → pinned candidates; you approve each install
/jg-build all # milestones in order: Fable plans, agents build in worktrees,
# reviewers check, merge.sh lands, accept.py decides; you merge to main
/jg-ux # a fresh-eyes persona tries the app; a judge grades the trail;
# findings become numbers Nightshift can move
/jg-ship v0.1.0 # a checklist script; you type "deploy"; a persona smoke run
/jg-feedback # FEEDBACK.md and error exports → backlog rows
/jg-loop dryrun # then Nightshift: it scores the baseline itself and picks
# from the spec, persona and feedback rows
The contract is `pipeline/README.md`. The human gates: the validation verdict, spec signed, every install, milestone merge to main, token approval, first screenshot baselines, deploy.
Two real projects have been through every stage in the cloud: Pocket Notes (a Vite app, $18.45) and Inbox Triage (FastAPI + SQLite + an LLM behind three backends, $32.32 including a validation verdict, three milestones, ship, feedback and two Nightshift nights). `retro/RETRO.md` has the numbers.
`retro/` judges the kit itself: `collect.py` counts what the drivers wrote across projects, `report.py` renders `retro/RETRO.md` with a trend, past mistakes live as cases in `retro/corpus/`, and `loop/scorers/kit_eval.py` scores suites + corpus + redacted-stream replay so Nightshift on this repo climbs the kit's own record. No model, no transcript (`retro/README.md`).
Per-project templates
Pick the template that matches your stack and copy it into the project root as `CLAUDE.md`, then fill in the placeholders:
cp ~/Claude_Upgrade/templates/CLAUDE.python.md /path/to/your/project/CLAUDE.md
cp ~/Claude_Upgrade/templates/CLAUDE.nextjs.md /path/to/your/project/CLAUDE.md
cp ~/Claude_Upgrade/templates/CLAUDE.general.md /path/to/your/project/CLAUDE.md
Pre-push hook
Install the hook into a project with:
~/Claude_Upgrade/install.sh --project /path/to/your/project
This symlinks `hooks/pre-push` into the target project's `.git/hooks/pre-push`, so edits to the hook in this repo flow through to every project that installed it. The hook prompts for confirmation before pushing to `main`. In non-interactive environments (CI, automated tooling) it allows the push through silently — the prompt is a safety net for humans, not an authorization barrier.
Related Agents
Chamber Synthesizer
Phase 10 Review Chamber coordinator and judge that orchestrates the debate lifecycle between Ideator, Tracer,
Robin
Read-only, skeptical evidence auditor for a Superloopy criterion. Use to judge whether Superloopy's determinis
Voice Call Judge Escalated
High-effort voice-call rubric judge for conflicting or incident evidence
Eval Judge
Use this agent during the /eval Skill Phase 3 (Epic #803, issue #810) to judge — from a session-eval record's
Calibration Judge
Truth Tribunal judge — confidence statements match evidence strength
Debate Tribunal
Multi-agent structured debate protocol where 3-5 persona-driven debaters argue positions through claim-evidenc
Related Skills
Audio Compare
Advisory before/after audio judgment — measure → compare → judge two renders and weigh in on a DSP change with
AI Debate Club
A multi-agent debate engine. Two different LLMs argue any motion, research the web for themselves, and cite th
Extraction Judge.Prompt
Extraction Judge — Fact Durability Rubric